SI Index Data as of Oct 9, 2026

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct: Price, Context, Benchmarks, and Release Details

Alibaba / Qwen provisional listing open weights · first seen Oct 8, 2026 · score computed Oct 9, 2026, 01:50 UTC
48.0
SI Score (method si-v3-retained-evidence-2)
19% confidence 19 percent, Low confidence — 2 of 8 expected sources in
Coverage 15% of expected source weight · 100% confidence at 80% coverage

Pillar breakdown

Coding (weight 40 percent) 36.8
Math (weight 15 percent) —
Preference (weight 15 percent) —
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) —

Pillar weights: reasoning 30% · math 15% · coding 40% · preference 15%. Benchmark results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging; incomplete evidence is shrunk toward 50.

Facts

Input price / 1M
$0.22Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; 0<Token≤32K; . Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Output price / 1M
$0.86Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; 0<Token≤32K; . Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Context window
262Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
65.5Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Apr 1, 2025models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Open weights
Yesmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
not yet reported
Input modalities
textmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

Benchmark results

3 results
Benchmark Raw result Normalized (0–100) Pillar
swe bench verified 52.2%SWE-bench VerifiedSWE-bench published model plus agent result; harness retained, not a base model evaluation [variant] EntroPO + R2EPublished Sep 1, 2025 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ 		52.2 coding
swe bench verified 51.6%SWE-bench VerifiedSWE-bench published model plus agent result; harness retained, not a base model evaluation [variant] OpenHandsPublished Aug 5, 2025 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ 		51.6 coding
terminal bench 15.2%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric success rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Published Jun 2, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗ 		15.2 coding

Normalization uses fixed absolute 0–100 scales for each unit, independently of other models that have a result on each benchmark. Coverage and evidence breadth still affect the composite; compare the evaluation conditions before reading a small score gap as decisive. “lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Sources: in and pending

in Reported (2)

  • Official model cards via models.dev · arrived Oct 8, 2026
  • SWE-bench Verified · arrived Oct 8, 2026

pending Awaiting (6)

  • ARC Prize · carries 11% of expected weight
  • Epoch AI Benchmarking · carries 23% of expected weight
  • Humanity’s Last Exam · carries 11% of expected weight
  • LiveBench · carries 11% of expected weight
  • LMArena / Arena · carries 23% of expected weight
  • Terminal-Bench · carries 6% of expected weight

The confidence % rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models — that is why 100% confidence arrives at 80% of expected weight, not at full coverage.