MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Price, Context, Benchmarks, and Release Details
62.6
SI Score (method si-v2-absolute-shrinkage-1)
#47 of 115 ranked
88% confidence 88 percent, High confidence — 2 of 3 expected sources in
Coverage 70% of expected source weight · 100% confidence at 80% coverage
Pillar breakdown
Coding (weight 40 percent) 50.7
Math (weight 15 percent) —
Preference (weight 15 percent) 79.0
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) 86.6
Pillar weights: reasoning 30% · math 15% · coding 40% · preference 15%. Benchmark results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging; incomplete evidence is shrunk toward 50.
Facts
- Input price / 1M
- not yet reported
- Output price / 1M
- not yet reported
- Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 8, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 131Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 8, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Apr 22, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 8, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Open weights
- Yesmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 8, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- textmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 8, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Benchmark results
6 results| Benchmark | Raw result | Normalized (0–100) | Pillar |
|---|---|---|---|
| gpqa diamond | 86.6%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric accuracy; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Published Apr 22, 2026
Retrieved Oct 8, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription Open source ↗ | 86.6 | reasoning |
| lmarena text | 1465.0 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 2, 2026
Retrieved Oct 8, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0 Open source ↗ | 79.0 | preference |
| swe bench pro | 57.2%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolve rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Published Apr 22, 2026
Retrieved Oct 8, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription Open source ↗ | 57.2 | coding |
| swe bench verified | 78.9%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolved; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant]
Retrieved Oct 8, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription Open source ↗ | 78.9 | coding |
| terminal bench v2 1 | 65.2%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric score; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] MiMo-V2.5 Pro comparison column; 2.1
Retrieved Oct 8, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription Open source ↗ | 65.2 | coding |
| terminal bench v4 0 | 1.5%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric score; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] MiMo-V2.5 Pro comparison column; 4.0
Retrieved Oct 8, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription Open source ↗ | 1.5 | coding |
Normalization uses fixed absolute 0–100 scales for each unit, independently of other models that have a result on each benchmark. Coverage and evidence breadth still affect the composite; compare the evaluation conditions before reading a small score gap as decisive. “lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Sources: in and pending
in Reported (2)
- Official model cards via models.dev · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- LMArena / Arena · arrived Oct 8, 2026
pending Awaiting (1)
- LiveBench · carries 30% of expected weight
The confidence % rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models — that is why 100% confidence arrives at 80% of expected weight, not at full coverage.