GLM-4.6: Price, Context, Benchmarks, and Release Details
47.8
SI Score (method si-v3-retained-evidence-2)
#112 of 140 ranked
55% confidence 55 percent, Medium confidence — 4 of 9 expected sources in
Coverage 44% of expected source weight · 100% confidence at 80% coverage
Pillar breakdown
Coding (weight 40 percent) 33.0
Math (weight 15 percent) —
Preference (weight 15 percent) 76.8
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) —
Pillar weights: reasoning 30% · math 15% · coding 40% · preference 15%. Benchmark results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging; incomplete evidence is shrunk toward 50.
Facts
- Input price / 1M
- $0.60Z.ai API pricingOfficial Z.ai global Standard uncached token rate; coding-plan subscriptions, cache and Batch excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output price / 1M
- $2.20Z.ai API pricingOfficial Z.ai global Standard uncached token rate; coding-plan subscriptions, cache and Batch excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 205Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 131Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Sep 30, 2025models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Open weights
- Yesmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- textmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Benchmark results
6 results| Benchmark | Raw result | Normalized (0–100) | Pillar |
|---|---|---|---|
| lmarena text | 1439.8 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 2, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0 Open source ↗ | 76.8 | preference |
| swe bench pro public | 9.7%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolve rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] public
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription Open source ↗ | 9.7 | coding |
| swe bench pro public | 9.7%SWE-bench Pro (public)Published steward score [variant] Published Jan 27, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation Open source ↗ | 9.7 | coding |
| swe bench verified | 55.4%SWE-bench VerifiedSWE-bench published model plus agent result; harness retained, not a base model evaluation [variant] mini-SWE-agent; 1.17.1Published Dec 1, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation Open source ↗ | 55.4 | coding |
| swe bench verified | 68.2%SWE-bench VerifiedSWE-bench published model plus agent result; harness retained, not a base model evaluation [variant] UndisclosedPublished Sep 30, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation Open source ↗ | 68.2 | coding |
| terminal bench | 25%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric success rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Published May 22, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription Open source ↗ | 25.0 | coding |
Normalization uses fixed absolute 0–100 scales for each unit, independently of other models that have a result on each benchmark. Coverage and evidence breadth still affect the composite; compare the evaluation conditions before reading a small score gap as decisive. “lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Sources: in and pending
in Reported (4)
- Official model cards via models.dev · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- LMArena / Arena · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench Verified · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench Pro (public) · arrived Oct 8, 2026
pending Awaiting (5)
- ARC Prize · carries 10% of expected weight
- Epoch AI Benchmarking · carries 20% of expected weight
- Humanity’s Last Exam · carries 10% of expected weight
- LiveBench · carries 10% of expected weight
- Terminal-Bench · carries 5% of expected weight
The confidence % rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models — that is why 100% confidence arrives at 80% of expected weight, not at full coverage.